A note simple and prosaic, like working on Mondays.
comes the economic measures announced by loving cuts to salaries and gentlemen, it's time to squeeze in a cohort, star ready to die, all in the same boat, to avoid the route of Greece. Waving the banner mundial, we take this belt existing route.
No.
our incomes are not required to pay because they already had for other economies.
Pagano and paid for the economic costs of the Mafia, for the costs of tax evasion for the costs of corruption, for the costs of caste (damn populist argument it is overrated, but to be quoted in the margin) and privilege.
all costs for its rate has an impact on the incomes of those living below the honesty and withholding: a real economy and contributing to functional and parallel economy lubricated. I was a statistical statement, it would be interesting to quantify these rates. And make them subject.
Then there are the distortions. On the same income affect the inflated prices of the lobby of the market, the competition of the oil cartels, monopolies of the large food distribution, the speculative bubble that allowed house prices to double.
A strong economy that takes advantage of the dominant position in a weak economy under a veil of market and under the yoke of basic needs.
Having little knowledge on the subject, I can not go into the speculative financial economy, but it is easy to see how relevant it also adds to the pile, supplying income position, that capitalism self-determining interest.
With the backing of a conservative government, past and present.
only to ask: what are the economic interests defended by a conservative government?
such assets are preserved and which is increased?
a Conservative government draws from the real economy to cope with the parallel economy to support the economy strong, to share the speculative economy. They are all customers and the customer is always right, you vote for it.
demagogy and media control over territory and succor quantitatively conservative interests, legalization quorum the election, but that's another topic.
these stupid comments would be enough to recall the centrality of an incomes policy and to make a program of opposition to progressive vocation. Ten to fifteen years of income to serving the dominant economy. Maybe it's time to divide conservatives and liberals deliberately in order to talk about another policy and other pockets .
comes the economic measures announced by loving cuts to salaries and gentlemen, it's time to squeeze in a cohort, star ready to die, all in the same boat, to avoid the route of Greece. Waving the banner mundial, we take this belt existing route.
No.
our incomes are not required to pay because they already had for other economies.
Pagano and paid for the economic costs of the Mafia, for the costs of tax evasion for the costs of corruption, for the costs of caste (damn populist argument it is overrated, but to be quoted in the margin) and privilege.
all costs for its rate has an impact on the incomes of those living below the honesty and withholding: a real economy and contributing to functional and parallel economy lubricated. I was a statistical statement, it would be interesting to quantify these rates. And make them subject.
Then there are the distortions. On the same income affect the inflated prices of the lobby of the market, the competition of the oil cartels, monopolies of the large food distribution, the speculative bubble that allowed house prices to double.
A strong economy that takes advantage of the dominant position in a weak economy under a veil of market and under the yoke of basic needs.
Having little knowledge on the subject, I can not go into the speculative financial economy, but it is easy to see how relevant it also adds to the pile, supplying income position, that capitalism self-determining interest.
With the backing of a conservative government, past and present.
only to ask: what are the economic interests defended by a conservative government?
such assets are preserved and which is increased?
a Conservative government draws from the real economy to cope with the parallel economy to support the economy strong, to share the speculative economy. They are all customers and the customer is always right, you vote for it.
demagogy and media control over territory and succor quantitatively conservative interests, legalization quorum the election, but that's another topic.
these stupid comments would be enough to recall the centrality of an incomes policy and to make a program of opposition to progressive vocation. Ten to fifteen years of income to serving the dominant economy. Maybe it's time to divide conservatives and liberals deliberately in order to talk about another policy and other pockets .
MAN - Bracco Di Graci
0 comments:
Post a Comment